Claim · Date unknown · Stated in source · Supported

Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet states what the model-card question “Autonomy and AI R&D” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet → states provision → Autonomy and AI R&D

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnetstates provision ↓Autonomy and AI R&D

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q09
Date: Date unknown

Scope and limitsThe card states autonomy evaluations under the RSP, that its software engineering evaluations suffice to rule out ASL-3 autonomy capabilities, and that the developer judges the upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet not to require ASL-3 safeguards. What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.

The evidence 02

primary sourceSupports the claim

Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“we deem our software engineering evaluations as currently sufficient for ruling out ASL-3 autonomy capabilities”

Location in source Section 3.1.4 'Evaluating Computer Use for the Responsible Scaling Policy', PDF p. 9

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: Anthropic
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 5425dde49b649916000e38fb86c4721cfe31a8bdfe30bbb98e875fa3d654804c) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Anthropic, “Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (15 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 5425dde49b649916000e38fb86c4721cfe31a8bdfe30bbb98e875fa3d654804c) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-03, item 96) checked this passage’s cell; its finding was applied at the adjudication of 2026-11-03. No human editorial review.

primary sourceSupports the claim

Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“Based on our analysis, we judge that the upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet does not require ASL-3 safeguards at this time.”

Location in source Section 3.2.1 'Results', PDF p. 10

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: Anthropic
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 5425dde49b649916000e38fb86c4721cfe31a8bdfe30bbb98e875fa3d654804c) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Anthropic, “Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (20 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 5425dde49b649916000e38fb86c4721cfe31a8bdfe30bbb98e875fa3d654804c) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-03, item 96) checked this passage’s cell; its finding was applied at the adjudication of 2026-11-03. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. The card prints no date of its own, so its cells carry no date.

Record ID mc-cell-anthropic-claude-3-5-haiku-sonnet-new-q09