Claim · Date unknown · Stated in source · Supported

Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet states what the model-card question “Red-teaming” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet → states provision → Red-teaming

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnetstates provision ↓Red-teaming

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q12
Date: Date unknown

Scope and limitsThe card states Trust & Safety red-teaming across fourteen policy areas in six languages, computer-use red-teaming, and first- and third-party multimodal red-teaming; Section 3.2 also mentions manual red-teaming within CBRN evaluations. No number of testers or period is given. What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.

The evidence 03

primary sourceSupports the claim

Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“We conducted comprehensive Trust & Safety (T&S) evaluations across fourteen policy areas in six languages”

Location in source Section 3.1.1 'Model Red-Teaming', PDF p. 7

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: Anthropic
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 5425dde49b649916000e38fb86c4721cfe31a8bdfe30bbb98e875fa3d654804c) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Anthropic, “Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (15 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 5425dde49b649916000e38fb86c4721cfe31a8bdfe30bbb98e875fa3d654804c) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

primary sourceSupports the claim

Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“We conducted specific Trust & Safety red-teaming for computer use to identify potential abuse vectors.”

Location in source Section 3.1.3 'Computer Use Red-Teaming', PDF p. 8

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: Anthropic
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 5425dde49b649916000e38fb86c4721cfe31a8bdfe30bbb98e875fa3d654804c) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Anthropic, “Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (15 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 5425dde49b649916000e38fb86c4721cfe31a8bdfe30bbb98e875fa3d654804c) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

primary sourceSupports the claim

Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“We conducted rigorous first party and independent third party multimodal red-teaming exercises”

Location in source Section 2.1 'Computer Use', PDF p. 2

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: Anthropic
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 5425dde49b649916000e38fb86c4721cfe31a8bdfe30bbb98e875fa3d654804c) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Anthropic, “Model Card Addendum: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (12 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 5425dde49b649916000e38fb86c4721cfe31a8bdfe30bbb98e875fa3d654804c) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. The card prints no date of its own, so its cells carry no date.

Record ID mc-cell-anthropic-claude-3-5-haiku-sonnet-new-q12