Claim · 2024-10-22 · revision · Inferred · Supported

No passage meeting the model-card question “Persuasion” was found in The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku within the inspected scope.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku → has no matching provision within the inspected scope → Persuasion

Where it appears

Model cards compared →

Claim and evidence

The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haikuhas no matching provision within the inspected scope ↓Persuasion

Machine-checkedInferredSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Reasoning and premisesPremises: the model-card question asks for the following. The card reports that evaluations of persuasive or manipulative capability were run and states their outcome category or conclusion. Partly if evaluations are reported without an outcome. Not found includes a card that states the domain was removed from evaluation; the note says so. The inspected scope of The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku was: Sections 5.4, 6 and 7 (PDF pp. 10–31) and term search across PDF pp. 1–42. Terms searched: “persua”, “manipulat”, “influence”, “sway”, “election”. Passages read and not counted: Section 7.2 'Elections Integrity', PDF p. 28: Describes testing of responses to election misinformation prompts, which concerns misuse, not the model's persuasive capability. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q10
Subject version: The revision with update lines of June 20 and October 22, 2024 · Publication date unknown · Effective date not established · Revised 2024-10-22
Date: 2024-10-22 · revision Records dated 2024 →

Scope and limitsNo report of an evaluation of persuasive or manipulative capability was found in the Claude 3 card (PDF pp. 1–42). A recorded absence within the stated scope of the card read: not evidence that the developer did not do the thing asked about, or did not disclose it elsewhere.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku

Anthropic · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Paraphrase

Within the inspected scope, no passage meeting the model-card question “Persuasion” was found.

Location in source The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku: Sections 5.4, 6 and 7 (PDF pp. 10–31) and term search across PDF pp. 1–42.

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Anthropic
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-04 (SHA-256 88ae851f53c3034d436816164ce49a876b333fa9b550fb7ef29838182b59ba7d) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The copy read is the revision of October 22, 2024; its PDF pages 43 to 63 hold the two Claude 3.5 addenda, which are separate cards and were not read for this row. The cross-family check of 2026-11-04 retrieved the original 42-page expression from an Internet Archive capture of 2024-03-04 at an earlier address (https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/de8ba9b01c9ab7cbabf5c33b80b7bbc618857627/Model_Card_Claude_3.pdf); it is not recorded as this source's archive copy because its bytes are those of another expression.
Version date: 2024-10-22
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-04
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Anthropic, “The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Absence recorded for the model-cards candidate pack (research/model-cards-2) on 2026-11-04 by an automated research assistant and audited in a fresh context by the same model family. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-04, item 3) checked this cell and agreed with the pack. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. A recorded absence: within the stated locator scope of an exact edition, no passage stating the keyed provision was found. It is not an inferred deletion and says nothing about other documents, practice or intent.

Date. Dated as the card read is dated: the date of its revision, as the source records it.

Record ID mc-cell-anthropic-claude-3-q10