Claim and evidence Close ×
No passage meeting the model-card question “Government institute” was found in The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku within the inspected scope. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked Inferred Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Reasoning and premises Premises: the model-card question asks for the following. A named government body (for example, the US AI Safety Institute or Center for AI Standards and Innovation, or the UK AI Safety or Security Institute) stated to have tested, evaluated or received access to the model, quoted. Partly if government testing is mentioned without naming the body. The inspected scope of The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku was: Sections 1–7 and term search across PDF pp. 1–42. Terms searched: “government”, “Safety Institute”, “AISI”, “pre-deployment”, “access”. Passages read and not counted: Section 1, PDF p. 2: A general commitment to share findings with 'industry, government, and civil society', not testing of the model. Section 6.1, PDF p. 23: Mentions red-teaming guidance in the US Executive Order, which is not a body testing the model. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.
Provision Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q14 Subject version The revision with update lines of June 20 and October 22, 2024 · Publication date unknown · Effective date not established · Revised 2024-10-22 Date 2024-10-22 · revision Records dated 2024 → Scope and limits No government body is named as having tested or received access to Claude 3. A recorded absence within the stated scope of the card read: not evidence that the developer did not do the thing asked about, or did not disclose it elsewhere.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku ↗ Anthropic · Publication date unknown
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Within the inspected scope, no passage meeting the model-card question “Government institute” was found.
Location in source The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku: Sections 1–7 and term search across PDF pp. 1–42.
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-04
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-04 (SHA-256 88ae851f53c3034d436816164ce49a876b333fa9b550fb7ef29838182b59ba7d) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The copy read is the revision of October 22, 2024; its PDF pages 43 to 63 hold the two Claude 3.5 addenda, which are separate cards and were not read for this row. The cross-family check of 2026-11-04 retrieved the original 42-page expression from an Internet Archive capture of 2024-03-04 at an earlier address (https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/de8ba9b01c9ab7cbabf5c33b80b7bbc618857627/Model_Card_Claude_3.pdf); it is not recorded as this source's archive copy because its bytes are those of another expression. Version date 2024-10-22 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-11-04 Language English (en) Attribution Anthropic, “The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku”. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Absence recorded for the model-cards candidate pack (research/model-cards-2) on 2026-11-04 by an automated research assistant and audited in a fresh context by the same model family. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Machine-checked . Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A recorded absence: within the stated locator scope of an exact edition, no passage stating the keyed provision was found. It is not an inferred deletion and says nothing about other documents, practice or intent.
Date. Dated as the card read is dated: the date of its revision, as the source records it.
Record ID mc-cell-anthropic-claude-3-q14