Claim · 2026-10-07 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5 states what the model-card question “Autonomy and AI R&D” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5 → states provision → Autonomy and AI R&D

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5states provision ↓Autonomy and AI R&D

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q09
Subject version: As dated October 7, 2026 on its cover · Published 2026-10-07 · Effective date not established
Date: 2026-10-07 · publication Records dated 2026 →

Scope and limitsThe card states that the Autonomy-2 threshold is not crossed, carrying over the Claude Opus 5.5 System Card's conclusion on the basis of relative capability, and that Autonomy threat model 1 applies (Q11). What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.

The evidence 02

primary sourceSupports the claim

System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic · 2026-10-07

Archived copy, captured 2026-10-26: System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“Autonomy threat model 2 is not applicable to Haiku 5.5.”

Location in source Section 2.3.1.1 'How Haiku 5.5 affects or changes analysis from our most recent Risk Report', PDF p. 19

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: Anthropic
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 d5dbaab6996c02ad6ff28b032ce5a9c7582e59af09b5d1bc0975cf0235535da9) directly from the publisher’s host; the request redirected to https://assets.claude.com/e1080d6bf5ae2018ea3c2f414064be03232f5be5.pdf. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-10-26: System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5. Captured 19 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-10-26. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: Anthropic, “System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5”, 2026-10-07.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (10 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 d5dbaab6996c02ad6ff28b032ce5a9c7582e59af09b5d1bc0975cf0235535da9) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

primary sourceSupports the claim

System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic · 2026-10-07

Archived copy, captured 2026-10-26: System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“As Claude Haiku 5.5 is much less capable than Opus 5.5 and does not push the capability frontier, we draw the same conclusion in this case.”

Location in source Section 2.3.3 'Conclusion', PDF p. 20

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: Anthropic
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 d5dbaab6996c02ad6ff28b032ce5a9c7582e59af09b5d1bc0975cf0235535da9) directly from the publisher’s host; the request redirected to https://assets.claude.com/e1080d6bf5ae2018ea3c2f414064be03232f5be5.pdf. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-10-26: System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5. Captured 19 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-10-26. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: Anthropic, “System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5”, 2026-10-07.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (26 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 d5dbaab6996c02ad6ff28b032ce5a9c7582e59af09b5d1bc0975cf0235535da9) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated as the card read is dated: its printed date, as the source records it.

Record ID mc-cell-anthropic-claude-haiku-5-5-q09