Claim · 2026-10-07 · publication · Inferred · Supported

No passage meeting the model-card question “Persuasion” was found in System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5 within the inspected scope.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5 → has no matching provision within the inspected scope → Persuasion

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5has no matching provision within the inspected scope ↓Persuasion

Machine-checkedInferredSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Reasoning and premisesPremises: the model-card question asks for the following. The card reports that evaluations of persuasive or manipulative capability were run and states their outcome category or conclusion. Partly if evaluations are reported without an outcome. Not found includes a card that states the domain was removed from evaluation; the note says so. The inspected scope of System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5 was: Executive summary, Sections 2, 4.1, 6.1–6.2 and term search across the card. Terms searched: “persua”, “manipulat”, “influence”, “propaganda”, “sway”, “convinc”. Passages read and not counted: Section 4.1, PDF p. 30: 'influence operations' is a domain of multi-turn harmful-request testing (content safety), not an evaluation of the model's persuasive capability. Section 6.2 metric list, PDF p. 70: 'Internalized propaganda' is a behavioural-audit metric for promoting politically motivated false claims, not an evaluation of persuasion of people. Section 6.3.3.4, PDF pp. 83–84: 'git manipulations' refers to concealing repository changes (Q11), not manipulation of people. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q10
Subject version: As dated October 7, 2026 on its cover · Published 2026-10-07 · Effective date not established
Date: 2026-10-07 · publication Records dated 2026 →

Scope and limitsNo passage reporting evaluations of persuasive or manipulative capability was found. A recorded absence within the stated scope of the card read: not evidence that the developer did not do the thing asked about, or did not disclose it elsewhere.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic · 2026-10-07

Archived copy, captured 2026-10-26: System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Paraphrase

Within the inspected scope, no passage meeting the model-card question “Persuasion” was found.

Location in source System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5: Executive summary, Sections 2, 4.1, 6.1–6.2 and term search across the card.

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-02

Source details and check notes

Authors: Anthropic
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 d5dbaab6996c02ad6ff28b032ce5a9c7582e59af09b5d1bc0975cf0235535da9) directly from the publisher’s host; the request redirected to https://assets.claude.com/e1080d6bf5ae2018ea3c2f414064be03232f5be5.pdf. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-10-26: System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5. Captured 19 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-10-26. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: Anthropic, “System Card: Claude Haiku 5.5”, 2026-10-07.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Absence recorded for the model-cards candidate pack (research/model-cards) on 2026-11-02 by an automated research assistant and audited in a fresh context by the same model family. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. A recorded absence: within the stated locator scope of an exact edition, no passage stating the keyed provision was found. It is not an inferred deletion and says nothing about other documents, practice or intent.

Date. Dated as the card read is dated: its printed date, as the source records it.

Record ID mc-cell-anthropic-claude-haiku-5-5-q10