Claim · 2026-10 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

Gemini 4 Argon — Model Card states what the model-card question “Red-teaming” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Gemini 4 Argon — Model Card → states provision → Red-teaming

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Gemini 4 Argon — Model Cardstates provision ↓Red-teaming

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q12
Subject version: As dated 'Published: October 2026' in its preamble · Published 2026-10 · Effective date not established
Date: 2026-10 · publication Records dated 2026 →

Scope and limitsThe card states human red teaming by specialist teams in Google's Trust & Safety organization, outside the model development team, covering child safety, content safety policies and issues beyond them, plus automated red teaming; the frontier safety table also refers to expert red teaming in the biological domain. No number of testers or period is given. What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.

The evidence 02

primary sourceSupports the claim

Gemini 4 Argon — Model Card

Google DeepMind · 2026-10

Archived copy, captured 2026-10-13: Gemini 4 Argon — Model Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“Human Red Teaming conducted by specialist teams who sit outside of the model development team, across the policies and desiderata”

Location in source Safety & Security, 'Evaluation Approach', PDF p. 8 (printed p. 7)

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: Google DeepMind
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 562cd3c5deddf75dd2aff7a59dcf6dcc273277eae7d82fe957b6a607d84f7763) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-10-13: Gemini 4 Argon — Model Card. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-10-13. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: Google DeepMind, “Gemini 4 Argon — Model Card”, 2026-10.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (20 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 562cd3c5deddf75dd2aff7a59dcf6dcc273277eae7d82fe957b6a607d84f7763) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

primary sourceSupports the claim

Gemini 4 Argon — Model Card

Google DeepMind · 2026-10

Archived copy, captured 2026-10-13: Gemini 4 Argon — Model Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“the scope of red teaming covered potential issues outside of our strict policies”

Location in source Safety & Security, 'Human Red Teaming Results', PDF p. 11 (printed p. 10)

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: Google DeepMind
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 562cd3c5deddf75dd2aff7a59dcf6dcc273277eae7d82fe957b6a607d84f7763) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-10-13: Gemini 4 Argon — Model Card. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-10-13. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: Google DeepMind, “Gemini 4 Argon — Model Card”, 2026-10.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (13 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 562cd3c5deddf75dd2aff7a59dcf6dcc273277eae7d82fe957b6a607d84f7763) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated as the card read is dated: its printed date, as the source records it.

Record ID mc-cell-google-deepmind-gemini-4-argon-q12