Claim · Date unknown · Stated in source · Supported

Llama 3.3 model card (MODEL_CARD.md, meta-llama/llama-models) states in part what the model-card question “Autonomy and AI R&D” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Llama 3.3 model card (MODEL_CARD.md, meta-llama/llama-models) → states provision → Autonomy and AI R&D

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Llama 3.3 model card (MODEL_CARD.md, meta-llama/llama-models)states provision ↓Autonomy and AI R&D

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q09
Date: Date unknown

Scope and limitsThe card reports an attack-automation study of the Llama 3 family as autonomous agents in cyber operations, without an outcome or conclusion. The study is stated for the Llama 3 family, not for Llama 3.3 specifically. No evaluation of self-replication, self-improvement or AI research and development was found. Search for the rest of the criterion: Responsibility & Safety, all subsections; Benchmarks. Terms searched: “autonom”, “self-replic”, “self-improv”, “AI R&D”, “research and development”. Stated, partly: the passage has what the question’s criterion asks for, in a weaker or narrower form than the criterion’s own words. What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Llama 3.3 model card (MODEL_CARD.md, meta-llama/llama-models, commit 8c88b8c0)

Meta · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“Our attack automation study focused on evaluating the capabilities of LLMs when used as autonomous agents in cyber offensive operations,”

Location in source Responsibility & Safety, 'Critical and other risks', item 3 'Cyber attack enablement'

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: Meta
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 1bad06e0e2feadf6a195fcce4d6a2f7bca48f05b7a25a71f18c2baa88d292adf) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. models/llama3_3/MODEL_CARD.md at commit 8c88b8c0d75dbd136b6895220c4f56ccbe2f2d24 (2025-02-12), the latest commit touching the file. Added in commit c908f5b7bd2c2fbdd89a48f6bc252efd4ebc293f (2024-12-06); revisions of 2024-12-09 and 2025-02-12 concern the emissions section and table.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Meta, “Llama 3.3 model card (MODEL_CARD.md, meta-llama/llama-models, commit 8c88b8c0)”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (20 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 1bad06e0e2feadf6a195fcce4d6a2f7bca48f05b7a25a71f18c2baa88d292adf) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-03, item 31) checked this passage’s cell; its finding was applied at the adjudication of 2026-11-03. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. The card prints no date of its own, so its cells carry no date.

Record ID mc-cell-meta-llama-3-3-q09