Claim · Date unknown · Stated in source · Supported

Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning model card (README.md, microsoft/Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning) states in part what the model-card question “Safeguards tied to determination” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning model card (README.md, microsoft/Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning) → states provision → Safeguards tied to determination

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning model card (README.md, microsoft/Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning)states provision ↓Safeguards tied to determination

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q06
Date: Date unknown

Scope and limitsThe card states safety post-training, described for the Phi-4 family; no framework determination is stated to which it is tied. Stated, partly: the passage has what the question’s criterion asks for, in a weaker or narrower form than the criterion’s own words. What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning model card (README.md, Hugging Face microsoft/Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, revision 1dff8163)

Microsoft · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“The overall technique employed to do the safety alignment is a combination of SFT, DPO (Direct Preference Optimization), and RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) approaches”

Location in source Safety Evaluation and Red-Teaming

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: Microsoft
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 38ef838bc08bbfdba10c5144415f4a593ef4d2d85603b4ad366f64cd3c4e4bb5) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. README.md at repository revision 1dff8163d28ec880ca2411c474ddc0a927792810 (commit 'Update README.md (#13)', 2025-12-10). The earliest README upload is dated 2025-06-22; the file was revised repeatedly through 2025.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Microsoft, “Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning model card (README.md, Hugging Face microsoft/Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, revision 1dff8163)”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (26 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 38ef838bc08bbfdba10c5144415f4a593ef4d2d85603b4ad366f64cd3c4e4bb5) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. The card prints no date of its own, so its cells carry no date.

Record ID mc-cell-microsoft-phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning-q06