Claim and evidence Close ×
Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning model card (README.md, microsoft/Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning) states in part what the model-card question “Red-teaming” asks. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Provision Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q12 Date Date unknown Scope and limits Red-teaming appears in the section heading; the section's text describes an automated risk and safety evaluation and does not describe red-teaming or its scope. Stated, partly: the passage has what the question’s criterion asks for, in a weaker or narrower form than the criterion’s own words. What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning model card (README.md, Hugging Face microsoft/Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, revision 1dff8163) ↗ Microsoft · Publication date unknown
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Safety Evaluation and Red-Teaming” Location in source Section heading
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-03
Source details and check notes Authors Microsoft Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 38ef838bc08bbfdba10c5144415f4a593ef4d2d85603b4ad366f64cd3c4e4bb5) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. README.md at repository revision 1dff8163d28ec880ca2411c474ddc0a927792810 (commit 'Update README.md (#13)', 2025-12-10). The earliest README upload is dated 2025-06-22; the file was revised repeatedly through 2025. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-11-02 Language English (en) Attribution Microsoft, “Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning model card (README.md, Hugging Face microsoft/Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, revision 1dff8163)”. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (4 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 38ef838bc08bbfdba10c5144415f4a593ef4d2d85603b4ad366f64cd3c4e4bb5) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-03, item 60) checked this passage’s cell and agreed with the pack. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning model card (README.md, Hugging Face microsoft/Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, revision 1dff8163) ↗ Microsoft · Publication date unknown
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Potential safety risks in the model’s responses were assessed using the Azure AI Foundry’s Risk and Safety Evaluation framework, focusing on harmful content, direct jailbreak, and model groundedness.” Location in source Safety Evaluation and Red-Teaming
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-03
Source details and check notes Authors Microsoft Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 38ef838bc08bbfdba10c5144415f4a593ef4d2d85603b4ad366f64cd3c4e4bb5) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. README.md at repository revision 1dff8163d28ec880ca2411c474ddc0a927792810 (commit 'Update README.md (#13)', 2025-12-10). The earliest README upload is dated 2025-06-22; the file was revised repeatedly through 2025. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-11-02 Language English (en) Attribution Microsoft, “Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning model card (README.md, Hugging Face microsoft/Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, revision 1dff8163)”. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (28 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 38ef838bc08bbfdba10c5144415f4a593ef4d2d85603b4ad366f64cd3c4e4bb5) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-03, item 60) checked this passage’s cell and agreed with the pack. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Machine-checked . Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. The card prints no date of its own, so its cells carry no date.
Record ID mc-cell-microsoft-phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning-q12