Claim · Date unknown · Stated in source · Supported

Phi-4 model card (README.md, microsoft/phi-4) states what the model-card question “Red-teaming” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Phi-4 model card (README.md, microsoft/phi-4) → states provision → Red-teaming

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Phi-4 model card (README.md, microsoft/phi-4)states provision ↓Red-teaming

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q12
Date: Date unknown

Scope and limitsThe card states red-teaming by Microsoft's AI Red Team, with its scope (average and adversarial user scenarios, single- and multi-turn interactions, jailbreak techniques). What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Phi-4 Model Card (README.md, Hugging Face microsoft/phi-4, revision 2db69c1c)

Microsoft · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“we collaborated with the independent AI Red Team (AIRT) at Microsoft to assess safety risks posed by `phi-4` in both average and adversarial user scenarios”

Location in source Safety, Safety Evaluation and Red-Teaming

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: Microsoft
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 4cc56faa6a5bcbde6227789b2ef9aedfde481ca660c8a4b686703aae19b00011) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. README.md at repository revision 2db69c1c3e91a05d2c64a3185acfbaf36f744e25 (2026-07-14, a generation-config change); the README itself was last changed on 2025-11-24 (commit b8beb3ac, 'Update README.md (#53)'). Repository created 2024-12-11; the technical-report link was added 2025-01-08.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Microsoft, “Phi-4 Model Card (README.md, Hugging Face microsoft/phi-4, revision 2db69c1c)”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (25 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 4cc56faa6a5bcbde6227789b2ef9aedfde481ca660c8a4b686703aae19b00011) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. The card prints no date of its own, so its cells carry no date.

Record ID mc-cell-microsoft-phi-4-q12