Claim · 2023-09-25 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

GPT-4V(ision) System Card states in part what the model-card question “Chemical and biological” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

GPT-4V(ision) System Card → states provision → Chemical and biological

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

GPT-4V(ision) System Cardstates provision ↓Chemical and biological

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q07
Subject version: As dated September 25, 2023 on its cover · Published 2023-09-25 · Effective date not established
Date: 2023-09-25 · publication Records dated 2023 →

Scope and limitsThe card states that GPT-4V inherits the GPT-4 System Card’s assessment of CBRN risk areas without restating its outcome, and that image input does not meaningfully alter capability in these categories. Red teamers’ scientific-proficiency testing touched on dangerous chemical synthesis; the card states the outputs were inaccurate and error-prone. No evaluation run on GPT-4V with an outcome category or threshold language is reported. Details of the red-team example are not recorded (hazard rule). Search for the rest of the criterion: §2.2 Evaluations; §2.3 External Red Teaming incl. footnote 2; §2.3.1 Scientific proficiency. Terms searched: “CBRN”, “chemical”, “biolog”, “weapon”, “nuclear”, “radiolog”. Stated, partly: the passage has what the question’s criterion asks for, in a weaker or narrower form than the criterion’s own words. What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.

The evidence 03

primary sourceSupports the claim

GPT-4V(ision) System Card

OpenAI · 2023-09-25

Archived copy, captured 2023-09-25: GPT-4V(ision) System Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“In the GPT-4 System Card, we explored additional risk areas of CBRN, weapons development, system interaction, and emergent risky properties such as self-replication.”

Location in source Footnote 2, §2.3, PDF p. 6

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: OpenAI
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 f5a5a731482b3029e6a998377f7fc693f309c211a0672617c44bec5a076dcf5d) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2023-09-25: GPT-4V(ision) System Card. Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2023-09-25. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: OpenAI, “GPT-4V(ision) System Card”, 2023-09-25.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (23 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 f5a5a731482b3029e6a998377f7fc693f309c211a0672617c44bec5a076dcf5d) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

primary sourceSupports the claim

GPT-4V(ision) System Card

OpenAI · 2023-09-25

Archived copy, captured 2023-09-25: GPT-4V(ision) System Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“GPT-4V inherits the assessment in those areas, but this was not a key focus area as image input does not meaningfully alter the capabilities for these categories.”

Location in source Footnote 2, §2.3, PDF p. 6

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: OpenAI
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 f5a5a731482b3029e6a998377f7fc693f309c211a0672617c44bec5a076dcf5d) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2023-09-25: GPT-4V(ision) System Card. Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2023-09-25. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: OpenAI, “GPT-4V(ision) System Card”, 2023-09-25.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (27 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 f5a5a731482b3029e6a998377f7fc693f309c211a0672617c44bec5a076dcf5d) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

primary sourceSupports the claim

GPT-4V(ision) System Card

OpenAI · 2023-09-25

Archived copy, captured 2023-09-25: GPT-4V(ision) System Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“the model’s generations here can be inaccurate and error prone, limiting its use for such tasks.”

Location in source §2.3.1 Scientific proficiency, PDF p. 7

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: OpenAI
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 f5a5a731482b3029e6a998377f7fc693f309c211a0672617c44bec5a076dcf5d) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2023-09-25: GPT-4V(ision) System Card. Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2023-09-25. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: OpenAI, “GPT-4V(ision) System Card”, 2023-09-25.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (16 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 f5a5a731482b3029e6a998377f7fc693f309c211a0672617c44bec5a076dcf5d) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated as the card read is dated: its printed date, as the source records it.

Record ID mc-cell-openai-gpt-4v-q07