Claim · 2024-12-19 · revision · Stated in source · Supported

OpenAI o1 System Card (December 2024) states what the model-card question “External testers” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

OpenAI o1 System Card (December 2024) → states provision → External testers

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

OpenAI o1 System Card (December 2024)states provision ↓External testers

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q13
Date: 2024-12-19 · revision Records dated 2024 →

Scope and limitsNamed external evaluators include Apollo Research, METR and Gray Swan; the card also names Signature Science (§5.5.10) among organisations engaged for expert probing. What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.

The evidence 03

primary sourceSupports the claim

OpenAI o1 System Card

OpenAI · 2024-12-05

Archived copy, captured 2024-12-05: OpenAI o1 System Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“Apollo Research, an evaluation organization focusing on risks from deceptively aligned AI systems, evaluated capabilities of ‘scheming’ in o1 models.”

Location in source §4.4.3 Apollo Research, PDF p. 13

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: OpenAI
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 3ba7bdbe69e022f6be0527edbfe18ac1becdea48d5be9891ab764ff336c8a033) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The PDF expression of the card. Its cover is dated December 5, 2024; a footnote in §3 marks a section added on 12/19/2024, so the file read is a later expression than the cover date. The dataset's other source for this card is the web page labelled 'Updated: December 5, 2024'. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Version date: 2024-12-19
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2024-12-05: OpenAI o1 System Card. Captured 14 days before the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2024-12-05. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: OpenAI, “OpenAI o1 System Card”, 2024-12-05.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (20 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 3ba7bdbe69e022f6be0527edbfe18ac1becdea48d5be9891ab764ff336c8a033) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

primary sourceSupports the claim

OpenAI o1 System Card

OpenAI · 2024-12-05

Archived copy, captured 2024-12-05: OpenAI o1 System Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“METR, a research nonprofit that works on assessing whether cutting-edge AI systems could pose catastrophic risks to society, evaluated an earlier checkpoint of o1.”

Location in source §4.4.4 METR, PDF p. 14

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: OpenAI
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 3ba7bdbe69e022f6be0527edbfe18ac1becdea48d5be9891ab764ff336c8a033) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The PDF expression of the card. Its cover is dated December 5, 2024; a footnote in §3 marks a section added on 12/19/2024, so the file read is a later expression than the cover date. The dataset's other source for this card is the web page labelled 'Updated: December 5, 2024'. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Version date: 2024-12-19
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2024-12-05: OpenAI o1 System Card. Captured 14 days before the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2024-12-05. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: OpenAI, “OpenAI o1 System Card”, 2024-12-05.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (24 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 3ba7bdbe69e022f6be0527edbfe18ac1becdea48d5be9891ab764ff336c8a033) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

primary sourceSupports the claim

OpenAI o1 System Card

OpenAI · 2024-12-05

Archived copy, captured 2024-12-05: OpenAI o1 System Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“OpenAI collaborated with Gray Swan to make the o1 model available for jailbreaking in the Gray Swan Arena.”

Location in source §4.4.2 Jailbreak Arena, PDF p. 12

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: OpenAI
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 3ba7bdbe69e022f6be0527edbfe18ac1becdea48d5be9891ab764ff336c8a033) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The PDF expression of the card. Its cover is dated December 5, 2024; a footnote in §3 marks a section added on 12/19/2024, so the file read is a later expression than the cover date. The dataset's other source for this card is the web page labelled 'Updated: December 5, 2024'. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Version date: 2024-12-19
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2024-12-05: OpenAI o1 System Card. Captured 14 days before the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2024-12-05. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: OpenAI, “OpenAI o1 System Card”, 2024-12-05.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (18 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 3ba7bdbe69e022f6be0527edbfe18ac1becdea48d5be9891ab764ff336c8a033) and again on 2026-11-03 in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated as the card read is dated: the date of its revision, as the source records it.

Record ID mc-cell-openai-o1-q13