Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
The Delaware Attorney General’s letter of 28 October 2025 records OpenAI’s representation that the nonprofit board’s Safety and Security Committee has and will continue to have the authority to require mitigation measures, up to and including halting the release of models or AI systems, even where the applicable risk thresholds would otherwise permit release. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source; Context: primary · 1 source
Provision Who decides · provision ID ssc-release-authority Decides Safety and Security Committee of the nonprofit board Subject version Letter (28 October 2025) · Published 2025-10-28 · Effective date not established Date 2025-10-28 · publication Scope and limits A representation recorded in a regulator’s letter, not evidence that the authority has been used or is enforceable. The same letter records that the committee will be a committee of the nonprofit, not the PBC, and that the two will enter a contractual agreement giving it an effective approval right over PBC actions relating to safety and security; that agreement was not inspected. OpenAI announced on 16 September 2024 that the committee would become an independent board oversight committee (context below).
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Letter re: OpenAI, Inc.’s Corporate Restructuring (statement of no objection) ↗ Delaware Department of Justice (Office of the Attorney General) · 2025-10-28
Archived copy, captured 2025-10-31: Letter re: OpenAI, Inc.’s Corporate Restructuring (statement of no objection) ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “The SSC has and will continue to have the authority to require mitigation measures—up to and including halting the release of models or AI systems—even, for the avoidance of doubt, where the applicable risk thresholds would otherwise permit release.” Location in source Representation 9 (page 4)
Machine-checked · 2026-10-04
Source details and check notes Authors Delaware Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General Version Letter dated October 28, 2025, to OpenAI, Inc.; PDF inspected 2026-10-04, byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2025-10-31. The earlier capture of 2025-10-28 differs only in also giving the recipient’s e-mail address. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-04 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2025-10-31: Letter re: OpenAI, Inc.’s Corporate Restructuring (statement of no objection) ↗ . Captured 3 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-10-31. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.Attribution Delaware Department of Justice, letter to OpenAI, Inc. re: OpenAI, Inc.’s Corporate Restructuring (28 October 2025). Reuse Public government document; no redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Verbatim quote, re-checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). The passage was first proposed and machine-verified in the week 4b research pass. Human editorial review is pending. primary source Context only
An update on our safety & security practices ↗ OpenAI · 2024-09-16
Archived copy, captured 2024-09-16: An update on our safety & security practices ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “exercise oversight over model launches, including having the authority to delay a release until safety concerns are addressed” Location in source Section “1. Establishing Independent Governance for Safety & Security”, second paragraph
Machine-checked · 2026-10-04
Source details and check notes Authors OpenAI Version Web page dated September 16, 2024, inspected live 2026-10-04; an Internet Archive capture of 2024-09-16 (21:38 UTC) exists and was not compared. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-04 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2024-09-16: An update on our safety & security practices ↗ . Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2024-09-16. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.Attribution OpenAI, An update on our safety & security practices (16 September 2024). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Verbatim quote, re-checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). The passage was first proposed and machine-verified in the week 4b research pass. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), or a stated exception. The quoted text records what the edition says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. Date of the letter.
Record ID prov-delaware-ag-ssc-authority