Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Preparedness Framework Version 2 states that if OpenAI is able to rigorously confirm that such a scenario (another frontier AI developer developing or releasing a system with High or Critical capability in a Tracked Category without comparable safeguards) has occurred, it could adjust accordingly the level of safeguards it requires in that capability area, but only if listed conditions hold. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Provision Exception · provision ID pf-marginal-risk-adjustment Subject version Version 2 · Published 2025-04-15 · Effective date not established · Revised 2025-04-15 Date 2025-04-15 · revision Scope and limits What the edition states, quoted from the cited expression. It is not evidence of implementation, compliance or effectiveness.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Preparedness Framework — Version 2 ↗ OpenAI · 2025-04-15
Archived copy, captured 2025-04-15: Preparedness Framework — Version 2 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “If we are able to rigorously confirm that such a scenario has occurred, then we could adjust accordingly the level of safeguards that we require in that capability area, but only if:” Location in source PDF p. 13 (printed p. 12), §4.3 Marginal risk, first paragraph, third sentence (up to the colon introducing three bullets)
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors OpenAI Version Preparedness Framework Version 2; revision date 2025-04-15. Version date 2025-04-15 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2025-04-15: Preparedness Framework — Version 2 ↗ . Captured on the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-04-15. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution OpenAI, Preparedness Framework — Version 2. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Verbatim excerpt checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the Internet Archive capture of 2025-04-15 (the edition as first captured) and the current file; the passage is identical in both. Extraction note: “such a scenario” is defined in the paragraph’s first sentence: another frontier AI model developer develops or releases a system with High or Critical capability in a Tracked Category without comparable safeguards. Ends at the colon; the three conditions (not quoted) are: the adjustment does not meaningfully increase overall risk of severe harm; OpenAI publicly acknowledges it; and safeguards stay more protective than the other developer’s, with information shared to validate this. Change log item 11 (PDF p. 15) refers to this approach. No Beta counterpart found earlier (searched “marginal”, “another”, “race”, “adjust”). Identical in both copies. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), or a stated exception. The quoted text records what the edition says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. Provision as stated in this edition, dated by the edition’s revision date.
Record ID prov-preparedness-v2-marginal-risk-adjustment