Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
v2.0's lowest threshold, 'Moderate or lower' with the measure label 'Deploy', applies where the Frontier AI shows relevant capabilities but could not substantially contribute to any threat scenario associated with a catastrophic outcome across plausible deployment and development scenarios, whereas v1.1's 'Moderate' threshold, with the measure label 'Release', applies where the model would not provide significant uplift towards execution of a threat scenario. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Inferred Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 2 sources
Reasoning and premises Premises: Meta AASF · v2 states the provision as quoted in its provision record (PDF p. 15 (printed p. 15), §3.3 Risk Thresholds, Table 1, 'Moderate or lower' row); Meta FAF · v1.1 states it as quoted in its provision record (PDF p. 13 (printed p. 13), §3.3 Risk thresholds, Table 1, Moderate row). The difference described is read directly from the two passages; the later edition’s change log states a related change (PDF p. 44 (printed p. 44), Appendix II – Change log, April 7, 2026 entry, 'Revised thresholds' sub-bullet (states the measure change from 'Release' to 'Deploy'; the 'Updated risk threshold language' sub-bullet describes the 'substantially contribute to' standard for the high and critical thresholds only)).
Basis of the change Inferred by comparing the two editions. No publisher statement of this change is recorded. Provision Threshold or trigger · provision ID meta-moderate-threshold Subject version v2.0 · Published 2026-04-08 · Effective date not established Object version v1.1 · Published 2025-02-03 · Effective date not established Date 2026-04-08 · publication Scope and limits A textual difference between the two editions’ wording of this keyed provision. It is not an assessment of whether the change strengthened or weakened the framework, and not evidence of implementation.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗ Meta · 2026-04-08
Archived copy, captured 2026-04-08: Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Advanced AI Scaling Framework v2.0 states, in the 'Moderate or lower' row of Table 1, that the Frontier AI shows relevant capabilities but could not substantially contribute to any threat scenario associated with a catastrophic outcome across plausible deployment and development scenarios.
Location in source PDF p. 15 (printed p. 15), §3.3 Risk Thresholds, Table 1, 'Moderate or lower' row
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors Meta Version Advanced AI Scaling Framework, Version 2; its change log dates the version April 7, 2026. The file served at the recorded address is byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2026-04-08. Version date 2026-04-07 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-03 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-04-08: Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗ . Captured 1 day after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-04-08. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-03.Attribution Meta, Advanced AI Scaling Framework, Version 2 (2026). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Paraphrase checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the cited edition; the edition’s own wording is quoted in its provision record. Human editorial review is pending. primary source Supports the claim
Frontier AI Framework — Version 1.1 ↗ Meta · 2025-02-03
Archived copy, captured 2025-02-13: Frontier AI Framework — Version 1.1 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Frontier AI Framework v1.1 states, in the Moderate row of Table 1, that the model would not provide significant uplift towards execution of a threat scenario.
Location in source PDF p. 13 (printed p. 13), §3.3 Risk thresholds, Table 1, Moderate row
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors Meta Version Frontier AI Framework, Version 1.1, as captured by the Internet Archive on 2025-02-13, the earliest complete capture located. The original address has returned HTTP 500 since April 2026; a revised expression under the same label was captured from 2025-03-28 and is recorded separately. Version date 2025-02-03 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-03 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2025-02-13: Frontier AI Framework — Version 1.1 ↗ . Captured 10 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-02-13. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-03.Attribution Meta, Frontier AI Framework, Version 1.1 (2025). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Paraphrase checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the cited edition; the edition’s own wording is quoted in its provision record. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. One scoped difference between document versions. The claim identifies publisher-stated change, official changelog/redline, or an explicitly inferred comparison. It does not establish implementation, effectiveness or a safety ranking.
Date. Dated by the later edition’s publication date.
Record ID provchange-meta-aasf-v2-0-moderate-threshold