Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Version 2’s passage states that OpenAI Leadership can approve or reject the SAG’s recommendations and that the Board’s Safety and Security Committee provides oversight of these decisions; the Beta’s passage names OpenAI Leadership as final decision-maker with the option for the OpenAI Board of Directors to overrule. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Inferred Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 2 sources
Reasoning and premises Premises: Preparedness · Version 2 states the provision as quoted in its provision record (PDF p. 4 (printed p. 3), §1 Introduction, final paragraph, second sentence); Preparedness · Beta states it as quoted in its provision record (PDF p. 22 (printed p. 22), Governance › “Operations”, opening paragraph, second sentence, items (2) and (3)). The difference described is read directly from the two passages.
Basis of the change Inferred by comparing the two editions. No publisher statement of this change is recorded. Provision Who decides · provision ID pf-final-decision-authority Subject version Version 2 · Published 2025-04-15 · Effective date not established · Revised 2025-04-15 Object version Beta · Published 2023-12-18 · Effective date not established Date 2025-04-15 · revision Scope and limits A textual difference between the two editions’ wording of this keyed provision. It is not an assessment of whether the change strengthened or weakened the framework, and not evidence of implementation. Comparison only; it does not assert that Version 2 replaces the Beta.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Preparedness Framework — Version 2 ↗ OpenAI · 2025-04-15
Archived copy, captured 2025-04-15: Preparedness Framework — Version 2 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Preparedness Framework Version 2 states that OpenAI Leadership can approve or reject the Safety Advisory Group’s recommendations and that the Board’s Safety and Security Committee provides oversight of these decisions.
Location in source PDF p. 4 (printed p. 3), §1 Introduction, final paragraph, second sentence
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors OpenAI Version Preparedness Framework Version 2; revision date 2025-04-15. Version date 2025-04-15 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2025-04-15: Preparedness Framework — Version 2 ↗ . Captured on the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-04-15. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution OpenAI, Preparedness Framework — Version 2. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Paraphrase checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the cited edition; the edition’s own wording is quoted in its provision record. Human editorial review is pending. primary source Supports the claim
Preparedness Framework — Beta ↗ OpenAI · 2023-12-18
Archived copy, captured 2023-12-18: Preparedness Framework — Beta ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Preparedness Framework (Beta) states that there is an advisory group, the Safety Advisory Group, to provide nuanced input and recommendations, and a final decision-maker, OpenAI Leadership, with the option for the OpenAI Board of Directors to overrule.
Location in source PDF p. 22 (printed p. 22), Governance › “Operations”, opening paragraph, second sentence, items (2) and (3)
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors OpenAI Version Preparedness Framework Beta; publication date 2023-12-18. Version date 2023-12-18 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2023-12-18: Preparedness Framework — Beta ↗ . Captured on the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2023-12-18. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution OpenAI, Preparedness Framework — Beta. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Paraphrase checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the cited edition; the edition’s own wording is quoted in its provision record. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. One scoped difference between document versions. The claim identifies publisher-stated change, official changelog/redline, or an explicitly inferred comparison. It does not establish implementation, effectiveness or a safety ranking.
Date. Dated by the later edition’s revision date.
Record ID provchange-preparedness-v2-final-decision-authority