Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
v2.0 makes the training pause conditional on a model in pretraining reaching capabilities comparable to or greater than a model that requires the ASL-3 Security Standard and continues it until that standard is implemented and established as sufficient for the model, within §6.2, which applies where a model requires the ASL-3 Required Safeguards but Anthropic is unable to implement them immediately; v1.0 committed to pause training before a model’s capability level outstrips the Containment Measures Anthropic has implemented. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Inferred Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 2 sources
Reasoning and premises Premises: RSP · v2.0 states the provision as quoted in its provision record (PDF p. 15 (printed p. 11), §6.2 Restrict Deployment and Further Scaling, bullet 'Monitoring pretraining', third sentence); RSP · 2023 states it as quoted in its provision record (PDF p. 4 (printed p. 4), 'Initial Commitments', numbered item 4 ('Evaluation protocol'), second sentence). The difference described is read directly from the two passages.
Basis of the change Inferred by comparing the two editions. No publisher statement of this change is recorded. Provision Required action · provision ID rsp-pause-training Subject version v2.0 · Publication date unknown · Effective 2024-10-15 Object version v1.0 · Published 2023-09-19 · Effective 2023-09-19 Date 2024-10-15 · effective Scope and limits A textual difference between the two editions’ wording of this keyed provision. It is not an assessment of whether the change strengthened or weakened the framework, and not evidence of implementation.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0 ↗ Anthropic · Publication date unknown
Archived copy, captured 2024-10-22: Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase RSP v2.0 states that if a model in pretraining has capabilities comparable to or greater than the model that requires the ASL-3 Security Standard, Anthropic will pause training until it has implemented the ASL-3 Security Standard and established that it is sufficient for the model.
Location in source PDF p. 15 (printed p. 11), §6.2 Restrict Deployment and Further Scaling, bullet 'Monitoring pretraining', third sentence
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Responsible Scaling Policy v2.0; effective date 2024-10-15. v2.0 identity is supplied by the official archive and later dated changelogs; the cover is not numbered. Version date 2024-10-15 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2024-10-22: Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0 ↗ . Captured 7 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2024-10-22. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Paraphrase checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the cited edition; the edition’s own wording is quoted in its provision record. Human editorial review is pending. primary source Supports the claim
Responsible Scaling Policy — v1.0 ↗ Anthropic · 2023-09-19
Archived copy, captured 2023-09-19: Responsible Scaling Policy — v1.0 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase RSP v1.0 states that Anthropic commits to pause training before a model's capability level outstrips the Containment Measures it has implemented.
Location in source PDF p. 4 (printed p. 4), 'Initial Commitments', numbered item 4 ('Evaluation protocol'), second sentence
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Responsible Scaling Policy v1.0; effective date 2023-09-19. Version date 2023-09-19 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2023-09-19: Responsible Scaling Policy — v1.0 ↗ . Captured on the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2023-09-19. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v1.0. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Paraphrase checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the cited edition; the edition’s own wording is quoted in its provision record. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. One scoped difference between document versions. The claim identifies publisher-stated change, official changelog/redline, or an explicitly inferred comparison. It does not establish implementation, effectiveness or a safety ranking.
Date. Dated by the later edition’s effective date.
Record ID provchange-rsp-v2-0-pause-training