Claim and evidence Close ×
Goertzel's paper of 2015, discussing Bostrom's Superintelligence, states that a treacherous-turn outcome cannot be ruled out in principle but that there is no reason to expect it to be especially likely, and proposes testing it by experiments with less capable AIs. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2015-11 · publication Records dated 2015 → Role Contesting Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Engagement States the contrary. It disputes the likelihood of the turn without giving a reason against its premises beyond the lack of a reason to expect it. Scope and limits The paper does not deny the possibility; it disputes the likelihood.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Superintelligence: Fears, Promises and Potentials ↗ Journal of Evolution and Technology (jetpress.org), Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies · 2015-11
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “But there is also no reason to expect it to be especially likely.” Location in source Section on Bostrom, Chapter 8
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-31
Source details and check notes Authors Ben Goertzel Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 359c04f1b987c3d82f60c9d4a295c9d61f37b8a9e51f6780d16763a84b9fa10a). HTML article as served on 2026-10-29; the page header gives "25(2) – December 2015" and "Vol. 24 Issue 2 – November 2015"; the page's character encoding is mis-declared, so quotations avoid affected characters. The cross-family check retrieved it again on 2026-10-31, with the same bytes. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-29 Language English (en) Attribution Ben Goertzel, “Superintelligence: Fears, Promises and Potentials”, 2015-11. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI (research/risk-debate). The quotation (13 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
Superintelligence: Fears, Promises and Potentials ↗ Journal of Evolution and Technology (jetpress.org), Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies · 2015-11
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “This would also seem to be the sort of possibility that could be explored via simulations and experiments with AIs at infrahuman levels of general intelligence.” Location in source Section on Bostrom, Chapter 8
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-31
Source details and check notes Authors Ben Goertzel Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 359c04f1b987c3d82f60c9d4a295c9d61f37b8a9e51f6780d16763a84b9fa10a). HTML article as served on 2026-10-29; the page header gives "25(2) – December 2015" and "Vol. 24 Issue 2 – November 2015"; the page's character encoding is mis-declared, so quotations avoid affected characters. The cross-family check retrieved it again on 2026-10-31, with the same bytes. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-29 Language English (en) Attribution Ben Goertzel, “Superintelligence: Fears, Promises and Potentials”, 2015-11. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI (research/risk-debate). The quotation (26 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document disputes the proposition or a premise it depends on. The record documents the text’s position, not who is right.
Date. The page gives both "Vol. 24 Issue 2 – November 2015" and "25(2) – December 2015"; the record keeps November 2015. The cross-family check of 2026-10-31 noted the conflict.
Record ID rd-b1-goertzel-2015-superintelligence-fears