Gans's blog post of 23 June 2023, written after the Munk debate of that week, argues that even assuming a superintelligent machine emerges, killing humanity would be costly and unnecessary for it, that a rational machine would keep its options open, and that self-improvement poses it control problems that would slow its rise.
One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.
What it connects
Why I am not worried about superintelligent machines killing us all → contests → Existential risk from misalignment or loss of control