Claim and evidence Close ×
Hawkins's essay of 2 March 2015 states that the machine-intelligence technology being created, based on neocortical principles, will not lead to self-replicating robots with uncontrollable intentions, and that there is no existential threat. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2015-03-02 · publication Records dated 2015 → Role Contesting Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Engagement Engages a premise. Disputes the premise that capable machines would come to pursue goals of their own at odds with ours, since neocortex-based machines lack desires. Scope and limits The essay limits its claim to "the future we can see and control today" and the coming decades. The opening item is a paraphrase because a line break in the retrieved text splits "self-replicating".
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
The Terminator Is Not Coming. The Future Will Thank Us. ↗ Re/code, now on vox.com · 2015-03-02
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Hawkins writes that the machine-intelligence technology being created today, based on neocortical principles, will not lead to self-replicating robots with uncontrollable intentions.
Location in source Closing section
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-31
Source details and check notes Authors Jeff Hawkins Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 0634b128cfb96deace5ea8b21b4d514dae5f0e7e492645c361593c651d54bb47). current vox.com page (Re/code archive), datePublished 2015-03-02 in the page metadata. The cross-family check retrieved it again on 2026-10-31; the bytes differ, and the check compared the quoted passages. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-29 Language English (en) Attribution Jeff Hawkins, “The Terminator Is Not Coming. The Future Will Thank Us.”, 2015-03-02. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI (research/risk-debate). The paraphrase is Selekoa’s, written from the text retrieved for the candidate pack; it is not a quotation and was not machine-matched. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
The Terminator Is Not Coming. The Future Will Thank Us. ↗ Re/code, now on vox.com · 2015-03-02
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “There won’t be an intelligence explosion. There is no existential threat.” Location in source Closing section
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-31
Source details and check notes Authors Jeff Hawkins Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 0634b128cfb96deace5ea8b21b4d514dae5f0e7e492645c361593c651d54bb47). current vox.com page (Re/code archive), datePublished 2015-03-02 in the page metadata. The cross-family check retrieved it again on 2026-10-31; the bytes differ, and the check compared the quoted passages. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-29 Language English (en) Attribution Jeff Hawkins, “The Terminator Is Not Coming. The Future Will Thank Us.”, 2015-03-02. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI (research/risk-debate). The quotation (11 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document disputes the proposition or a premise it depends on. The record documents the text’s position, not who is right.
Date. Date of publication, as the source gives it.
Record ID rd-r08-hawkins-2015-terminator-not-coming