Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Claim · 2024-04-01 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

The paper by Gebru and Torres of April 2024 argues that those it calls “TESCREALists” use the language of “safety” to drive resources into building AGI, which harms marginalised groups, and then to dissuade investigations into those harms and divert resources into preventing a “hypothetical AGI apocalypse”, and that their influence has led policy-makers and researchers to prioritise the AGI agenda while siphoning resources away from task-specific systems.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

The TESCREAL bundle: Eugenics and the promise of utopia through artificial general intelligence → articulates → Present harms deserve priority

Where it appears