Claim and evidence Close ×
The Joint Statement on AI Safety and Openness hosted by Mozilla and dated 31 October 2023 states that increasing public access and scrutiny makes technology safer, and that openness is an antidote, not a poison, for AI safety and security. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2023-10-31 · publication Records dated 2023 → Role Articulation Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Scope and limits A signed statement: the record is what the statement says, not each signatory's view; the statement itself says its signatories hold different views on how open-source AI should be managed. It also states that open models can be abused.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Joint Statement on AI Safety and Openness ↗ Mozilla (open.mozilla.org) · 2023-10-31
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “increasing public access and scrutiny makes technology safer, not more dangerous.” Location in source Statement, second paragraph
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-31
Source details and check notes Authors Mozilla (host); signatories listed below the statement Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 0f90b36e723b224535072597083952a1c74f6b1498a2dd19769c5ec362f2f4fd). Current page (redirected to open.mozilla.org/ai-safety/), showing 1,821 signatures at retrieval; no archive capture compared. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-29 Language English (en) Attribution Mozilla (host); signatories listed below the statement, “Joint Statement on AI Safety and Openness”, 2023-10-31. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI (research/risk-debate). The quotation (11 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
Joint Statement on AI Safety and Openness ↗ Mozilla (open.mozilla.org) · 2023-10-31
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “When it comes to AI safety and security, openness is an antidote, not a poison.” Location in source Statement, last line
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-31
Source details and check notes Authors Mozilla (host); signatories listed below the statement Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 0f90b36e723b224535072597083952a1c74f6b1498a2dd19769c5ec362f2f4fd). Current page (redirected to open.mozilla.org/ai-safety/), showing 1,821 signatures at retrieval; no archive capture compared. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-29 Language English (en) Attribution Mozilla (host); signatories listed below the statement, “Joint Statement on AI Safety and Openness”, 2023-10-31. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI (research/risk-debate). The quotation (15 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document meets the proposition’s criterion. The record documents what the text states, in its register (fiction and satire are labelled); it is not evidence that the proposition is true and implies no influence on or from another text.
Date. Date of publication, as the source gives it.
Record ID rd-r15-mozilla-2023-joint-statement