Claim · 2023-07-18 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

The essay by Richards et al. of 18 July 2023 answers the CAIS statement, which it quotes.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

The Illusion Of AI's Existential Risk → cites → Statement on AI Risk

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

The Illusion Of AI's Existential Riskcites ↓Statement on AI Risk

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Date: 2023-07-18 · publication Records dated 2023 →

Scope and limitsA reply is not agreement; the record says only that the text answers the other.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

The Illusion Of AI's Existential Risk

Noema Magazine (noemamag.com) · 2023-07-18

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“On May 30, the San Francisco-based research group, the Center for AI Safety, released a succinct statement signed by some of the field’s top experts”

Location in source Paragraph 1

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-31

Source details and check notes

Authors: Blake Richards; Blaise Agüera y Arcas; Guillaume Lajoie; Dhanya Sridhar
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 5c15cb991de798d59e62554308ba82a3090f8f9f69f433f2205c2d35948d33fa). Current web page dated July 18, 2023; author notes on the page have been updated since (one mentions a book due in September). The cross-family check retrieved it again on 2026-10-31; the bytes differ, and the check compared the quoted passages.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-29
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Blake Richards, Blaise Agüera y Arcas, Guillaume Lajoie, Dhanya Sridhar, “The Illusion Of AI's Existential Risk”, 2023-07-18.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI (research/risk-debate). The quotation (25 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An explicit reference to a work. Citation alone is neither agreement nor causal influence.

Date. Date of publication, as the source gives it.

Record ID rd-reply-richards-2023-illusion-existential-risk-to-cais-2023-statement