Claim · 2020-02-14 · event · Stated in source · Supported

Marcus (2020) proposes a hybrid, knowledge-driven, reasoning-based approach to AI centred on cognitive models, in contrast to research emphasising general-purpose learning and ever-larger training sets.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligence → discusses →

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligencediscusses ↓

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Date: 2020-02-14 · event Records dated 2020 →

Scope and limitsA position paper; records the proposal, not its reception.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligence

arXiv (v3) · 2020-02-14

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“In contrast, I propose a hybrid, knowledge-driven, reasoning-based approach, centered around cognitive models, that could provide the substrate for a richer, more robust AI than is currently possible.”

Location in source PDF p. 1, abstract

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-31

Source details and check notes

Authors: Gary Marcus
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 80cb5a5ab68821a7a9cfd86f690622112f5957fcb49cbb783a1cf5b66348a926). arXiv:2002.06177v3 PDF, dated on its title page 17 February 2020.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-29
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Gary Marcus, “The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligence”, 2020-02-14.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, Kinds of AI and technical history (research/technical-history). The quotation (28 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. The concept is explicitly discussed in the document. This makes no earliest-use, invention or transmission claim.

Date. Date of submission (an arXiv version or a journal’s received date, as the source states it); not a later revision or the venue’s publication date.

Record ID th-ns-marcus-2020-def