primary source Supports the claim
Re: Thinking about the future... (Extropians mailing list) ↗ Extropians mailing list · 1996-09-04
Archived copy, captured 2015-04-27: Re: Thinking about the future... (Extropians mailing list) ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Access to a nanotechnology laboratory might be all the AI would need "in order to take off"; the contest would be over before anyone but the AI noticed it had begun.
Location in source Message body, first unquoted paragraph of the reply
Machine-checked · 2026-10-06
Source details and check notes Authors Nick Bostrom Version Archive HTML as served, retrieved 2026-10-06 with the hash recorded by the 1996–2022 candidate search; quoted lines excluded when reading the author’s text. Archive at extropians.weidai.com. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-06 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2015-04-27: Re: Thinking about the future... (Extropians mailing list) ↗ . Captured 6809 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2015-04-27. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-06.Attribution Nick Bostrom, "Re: Thinking about the future...", Extropians mailing list, 1996-09-04. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Paraphrase, so that the message’s quotation limit covers the A3 and A6 passages; locator corrected after a machine check. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document bears on the proposition without meeting its criterion; the record names the missing element. It is not an articulation and implies no influence.
Date. Archive receipt: Wed Sep 4 10:09:44 1996 MST. The Sent header is garbled in the archive.
Record ID ts-a4-bostrom-1996-09-04-context