Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Grace’s reading-group post of 2014-08-31 lists "Week 11: The treacherous turn" in its schedule. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2014-08-31 · publication Role Context, Earliest located use of the name Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Name used “treacherous turn” Missing element The term appears as a session title, with no statement of the concept. Scope and limits The earliest located use of the term in a post body; the title comes from chapter 8 of Bostrom’s Superintelligence (2014). A LessWrong comment of 2014-07-29 links an earlier blog post whose title uses the term; comments and linked posts were not searched.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Superintelligence reading group ↗ LessWrong · 2014-08-31
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Week 11: The treacherous turn” Location in source Reading schedule
Machine-checked · 2026-10-06
Source details and check notes Authors Katja Grace Version Text checked in the post’s first stored version through the LessWrong GraphQL API on 2026-10-06; content version 1.0.0, never edited. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-06 Language English (en) Attribution Katja Grace, "Superintelligence reading group", LessWrong, 2014-08-31. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Checked against the first stored version on 2026-10-06. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document bears on the proposition without meeting its criterion; the record names the missing element. It is not an articulation and implies no influence.
Date. Posting time 2014-08-31T14:59:31Z.
Record ID ts-b1-grace-2014-schedule-context