Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning
Nature 577, 706–710, published online 15 January 2020. All four dates from the article page, "About this article": "Received: 02 April 2019 Accepted: 10 December 2019 Published: 15 January 2020 Version of record: 15 January 2020 Issue date: 30 January 2020". Author list from the page's citation_author metadata; the printed list carries affiliation markers that are not reproduced.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- Demis Hassabis · John Jumper · Pushmeet Kohli · Andrew W. Senior
- Dates
- Published 2020-01-15 authorship evidence authorship evidence authorship evidence authorship evidence
- Exact source
- Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning Nature · published 2020-01-15 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 ae72fc1c6b140ff6c74fce998cd8f44d02cacbb78e381988b8ed8e0d517ebf2a). Nature article page, as served on 2026-10-30; author list and Author information section. The candidate pack retrieved the same page a second time on 2026-10-30, at an address carrying a cookie-error query string (SHA-256 0a0093d14f221edfb91d3a7bb52aa5ae5b1899935c1ccc63c86dc2e7f36c5f1d); the passages read in that retrieval are cited here.
Appears in
No collection holds a record about this document yet.
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Issue and authorship records
- Author: Demis HassabisDemis Hassabis is credited as a co-author of Senior et al., ‘Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning’ (Nature, published online 15 January 2020).2020-01-15 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Demis Hassabis: person page →
- Author: John JumperJohn Jumper is credited as a co-author of Senior et al., ‘Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning’ (Nature, published online 15 January 2020), one of five authors marked as contributing equally.2020-01-15 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗John Jumper: person page →
- Author: Pushmeet KohliPushmeet Kohli is credited as a co-author of Senior et al., ‘Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning’ (Nature, published online 15 January 2020).2020-01-15 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Pushmeet Kohli: person page →
- Author: Andrew W. SeniorAndrew W. Senior is credited as the lead-listed author of ‘Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning’ (Nature, published online 15 January 2020), whose contributions statement says that A.W.S. led the team.2020-01-15 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Andrew W. Senior: person page →
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.
What the document states
A limited selection of what this document states, each with its passage. It describes the text, not whether anyone acted on it.
- StatementCode and weights available for research and non-commercial use“Source code for the distogram, reference distogram and torsion prediction neural networks, together with the neural network weights and input data for the CASP13 targets are available for research and non-commercial use”code availabilityInspect claim & evidence ↗
- StatementNeural-network prediction of inter-residue distances as the stated contribution“Here we show that we can train a neural network to make accurate predictions of the distances between pairs of residues, which convey more information about the structure than contact predictions.”abstractInspect claim & evidence ↗
- StatementCASP13 free-modelling result as the authors report it“AlphaFold created high-accuracy structures … for 24 out of 43 free modelling domains, whereas the next best method, which used sampling and contact information, achieved such accuracy for only 14 out of 43 domains.”abstractInspect claim & evidence ↗