Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Document · Blog post

Machine intelligence, part 1

A blog post by Sam Altman, Author's blog, dated 25 February 2015. The page markup carries the timestamp 1424887402 (2015-02-25 UTC); no date is printed in the visible text.

Issued by
No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
Authors credited
No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Sam Altman.
Dates
  • No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2015-02-25.
Exact source
  • Machine intelligence, part 1 Author's blog (blog.samaltman.com) · published 2015-02-25 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 7001208dc834965a1e289f2c995225ffe3d1962a0e7f8a871ba991e085f500e1). Current blog page; the page carries no visible date in the retrieved text. The cross-family check retrieved it again on 2026-10-31, with the same bytes. The date of 25 February 2015 is not printed in the post's text; the cross-family check of 2026-10-31 could not confirm it from the page body.

Appears in

Versions

No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Articulates · 2

Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.

Bears on · 1

Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.

Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.