AI and Biorisk: An Explainer
Extended explainer PDF (December 2023). The CSET publication page gives "December 2023" and the author's name (`cset-biorisk-explainer`); the PDF itself carries no date, so the month stays a month.
- Issued by
- Center for Security and Emerging Technology (from the version record)
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source records list Center for Security and Emerging Technology, Georgetown University.
- Dates
- Published 2023-12
The CSET publication page gives "December 2023" and the author's name (`cset-biorisk-explainer`); the PDF itself carries no date, so the month stays a month.
- Exact source
- AI and Biorisk: An Explainer (extended explainer PDF) Center for Security and Emerging Technology, Georgetown University · publication date unknown · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 b42589d1df9f0b702975591dc9c064b7d92a9c761e9a24b1681668055af29c05). Extended explainer PDF, file name marked FINAL-v2, as served on 2026-10-28 Retrieved again at admission on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 b42589d1df9f0b702975591dc9c064b7d92a9c761e9a24b1681668055af29c05, the same bytes).
- AI and Biorisk: An Explainer (publication page) Center for Security and Emerging Technology, Georgetown University · publication date unknown · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 b8deadfa4acfb2e37de06cc19e3ae110b086cd557207350c772b58e8ca75fa13). Publication page as served on 2026-10-28; used only for the publication month and the author's name Retrieved again at admission on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 61f2fd18470acc7fbfe139699cfce023887e357f419943a5c8863fac0192412a). Its wording can change; earlier wording is not authenticated.
Appears in
- Arguments about AI and biological risk →3 records on this document
Versions
batalis-ai-biorisk-explainer: 1 recorded version, oldest first, published by Center for Security and Emerging Technology. A version is shown as replacing another only where a record says so. Date order alone never implies it.
- 2023-12 · publishedExtended explainer PDF (December 2023) (this version)
This version
Earliest version recorded here; no replacement is recorded.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Articulates · 1
Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.
- Biological design tools pose risks distinct from those of language modelsCSET's explainer of December 2023 treats biological design tools as a separate class from chatbots, stating that their use in its current state requires both scientific and programming expertise.2023-12 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Biological design tools pose risks distinct from those of language models: propositions page →
Bears on · 2
Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.
- The binding barrier is physical execution rather than informationCSET's explainer "AI and Biorisk" (December 2023) states that the barrier to scientific information is not high even for beginners, and that feasibility depends on both information and hands-on production success, without stating which of the two limits biological misuse.2023-12 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗The binding barrier is physical execution rather than information: propositions page →
- Assessment must cover actors who already hold relevant skillsCSET's explainer of December 2023 states that the biorisk landscape is not uniform and that specific scenarios and actors should be assessed individually, without stating that assessment must cover actors who already hold relevant skills.2023-12 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Assessment must cover actors who already hold relevant skills: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.