FAQ on Catastrophic AI Risks
A blog post by Yoshua Bengio, Author's blog, dated 24 June 2023. Date in the post address and its datePublished metadata.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Yoshua Bengio.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2023-06-24.
- Exact source
- FAQ on Catastrophic AI Risks Author's blog (yoshuabengio.org) · published 2023-06-24 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 11f36ff0a2f216bb47ae36e82e5790eb32ec52f621e14ff8f7203d5b26b9f323). Current page; its metadata gives datePublished 2023-06-24 and dateModified 2025-12-03, and the page shows no revision note, so later edits cannot be excluded.
Appears in
- Arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI →1 record on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Contests · 1
Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.
- Present harms deserve priorityBengio's FAQ of 24 June 2023 answers the objection that emphasis on existential risk removes attention from current harms by stating that work on current harms is needed, that the choice is not either/or, and that the governance required serves both.2023-06-24 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Present harms deserve priority: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.