Managing AI Risks in an Era of Rapid Progress
A preprint by Yoshua Bengio and 23 co-authors, arXiv:2310.17688, dated 26 October 2023. arXiv v1 stamp "26 Oct 2023" (submission date).
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, Andrew Yao, Dawn Song, Pieter Abbeel, Yuval Noah Harari, Ya-Qin Zhang, Lan Xue, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Gillian Hadfield, Jeff Clune, Tegan Maharaj, Frank Hutter, Atılım Güneş Baydin, Sheila McIlraith, Qiqi Gao, Ashwin Acharya, David Krueger, Anca Dragan, Philip Torr, Stuart Russell, Daniel Kahneman, Jan Brauner and Sören Mindermann.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2023-10-26.
- Exact source
- Managing AI Risks in an Era of Rapid Progress arXiv:2310.17688 · published 2023-10-26 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 d6ec9c8bb5db28ea6c52aff5cfb79a7c510244a9cb71dea01f3927f8b02afcc7). arXiv v1 PDF (2310.17688v1, 26 Oct 2023), titled "Managing AI Risks in an Era of Rapid Progress"; a revised version was published in Science in May 2024 as "Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress" and was not compared. The cross-family check retrieved it again on 2026-10-31, with the same bytes.
Appears in
- Arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI →2 records on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Articulates · 1
Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.
- Existential risk from misalignment or loss of controlThe consensus paper by Bengio, Hinton, Yao and others of 26 October 2023 states that, without sufficient caution, humanity may irreversibly lose control of autonomous AI systems, which could culminate in large-scale loss of life and the marginalisation or extinction of humanity.2023-10-26 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Existential risk from misalignment or loss of control: propositions page →
Contests · 1
Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.
- Capabilities will plateauBengio and twenty-three co-authors' paper of October 2023 states that there is no fundamental reason why AI progress would slow or halt at the human level, noting that AI already surpasses humans in narrow domains and is increasingly used to improve AI systems.2023-10-26 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Capabilities will plateau: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.