Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Document · Magazine debate

The Great Inflection? A Debate About AI and Explosive Growth

The Great Inflection? A Debate About AI and Explosive Growth, by Matt Clancy, Tamay Besiroglu. Asterisk magazine, issue 03.

Issued by
No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
Authors credited
No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Matt Clancy and Tamay Besiroglu.
Dates
  • No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2023-06.
Exact source

Appears in

Versions

No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Articulates · 6

Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.

  • Machine substitution for labour produces explosive growth: propositions page →
  • Automated research produces accelerating growth: propositions page →
  • Long-run history suggests a further acceleration: propositions page →
  • Essential unautomated tasks bottleneck growth: propositions page →
  • Current data show no approach to explosive growth: propositions page →
  • Estimates of explosive growth within a stated horizon: propositions page →

Contests · 3

Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.

  • Machine substitution for labour produces explosive growth: propositions page →
  • Essential unautomated tasks bottleneck growth: propositions page →
  • Other constraints prevent explosive growth: propositions page →

Bears on · 1

Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.

  • Long-run history suggests a further acceleration: propositions page →

Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.