Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Document · Book chapter

Neglected Open Questions in the Economics of Artificial Intelligence

Neglected Open Questions in the Economics of Artificial Intelligence, by Tyler Cowen. NBER volume chapter.

Issued by
No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
Authors credited
No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Tyler Cowen.
Dates
  • No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2019-05.
Exact source

Appears in

Versions

No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Articulates · 1

Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.

  • Compensating policy for AI’s distributional effects: propositions page →

Bears on · 6

Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.

  • Economics’ engagement with superintelligence, AGI and the singularity: propositions page →
  • AI as the automation of tasks: propositions page →
  • Machines cheaper than labour at every task: propositions page →
  • Automation lowers the labour share, wages or employment: propositions page →
  • Compensating policy for AI’s distributional effects: propositions page →
  • Recent entry of machine intelligence into mainstream economics: propositions page →

Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.