There is a blind spot in AI research
A journal article by Kate Crawford and Ryan Calo, Nature 538, dated 13 October 2016. Publication date printed on the article page ("Published: 13 October 2016").
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Kate Crawford and Ryan Calo.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2016-10-13.
- Exact source
- There is a blind spot in AI research Nature 538, 311–313 (nature.com) · published 2016-10-13 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 4825ce6bd4bd6b362bb27cb0faed1b1727ad559c3e47efbb317afeb0752900f7). Publisher's article page: the standfirst and metadata only; the article body is behind a paywall and was not read.
Appears in
- Arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI →1 record on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Bears on · 1
Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.
- Present harms deserve priorityThe Nature comment by Crawford and Calo of 13 October 2016 is summarised in its standfirst as arguing that fears about the future impacts of AI are distracting researchers from the real risks of deployed systems.2016-10-13 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Present harms deserve priority: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.