Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →
Document · Preprint
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models, by Tyna Eloundou, Sam Manning, Pamela Mishkin, Daniel Rock. arXiv:2303.10130v1.
Issued by
No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
Authors credited
No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Tyna Eloundou, Sam Manning, Pamela Mishkin and Daniel Rock.
Dates
No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2023-03-17.
Exact source
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models ↗ arXiv:2303.10130v1 · published 2023-03-17 · Full text (v1). Current copy retrieved directly on 2026-10-09; no archive capture (Wayback unreachable), so earlier bytes are not authenticated. SHA-256 f3c91bc909258b4824e2ea101a4f489aaea75d422adaf8508a79883b0d0f74bd. Journal version not retrieved. Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2024). GPTs are GPTs: Labor market impact potential of LLMs. Science, 384(6702), 1306–1308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj0998
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Articulates · 1
Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.