The Employment Impact of Technological Change. Appendix Volume II, Technology and the American Economy
The Employment Impact of Technological Change. Appendix Volume II, Technology and the American Economy, by National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1966; ERIC ED 022 857.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 1966-02.
- Exact source
- The Employment Impact of Technological Change. Appendix Volume II, Technology and the American Economy Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1966; ERIC ED 022 857 · published 1966-02 · Internet Archive OCR text (djvu.txt) of a scanned copy, retrieved 2026-10-09 from https://dn710704.ca.archive.org/0/items/ERICED022857/ERICED022857djvu.txt; OCR errors possible; quotes checked only against clean stretches. Current copy; no earlier capture compared. SHA-256 85b1fb59b997e8cbc0f7255076a55f68008955a2b10523b375ac0ae58628572c.
Appears in
- Economics of machine intelligence →1 record on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Bears on · 1
Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.