Commission Opinion C(2025) 5361 final on the assessment of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice

Versions

eu-gpai-code-assessment: 1 recorded version, oldest first, published by European Commission. A version is shown as replacing another only where a record says so. Date order alone never implies it.

1. 2025-08-01 · publishedOpinion of 1 August 2025 (this version)

This version

Provisions in this version · 4 quoted

A limited selection of quoted provisions: what this edition says about thresholds, required actions, who decides and exceptions. It is not a full summary and says nothing about implementation. A “not found” record states which part of the edition was inspected. It is not a claim that the text was deleted.

• Who decidesThe Board's assessment is published separately“The assessment by the Board is published separately.”Paragraph (2), last sentences (p. 2)Inspect claim & evidence ↗
• Who decidesCode adequately covers Articles 53 and 55 obligations and meets the aims of Article 56Section 5, paragraph (57) (p. 12)Inspect claim & evidence ↗
• Who decidesTransparency and Copyright chapters cover Article 53(1); Safety and Security chapter covers Article 55(1) and Annex XI Section 2“the Transparency and Copyright Chapters adequately cover the obligations provided for in Article 53(1)”Paragraph (28) (p. 7)Inspect claim & evidence ↗
• ExceptionOpinion does not prejudge enforcement, does not bind interpretation, and does not pre-empt a later finding of inadequacy“This Opinion does not prejudge any future action that the Commission, the Board, and other competent authorities, as applicable, may undertake in the enforcement of the AI Act.”Paragraph (3), first sentence (p. 2)Inspect claim & evidence ↗

Earliest version recorded here; no replacement is recorded.

Issue and authorship records

• Issued by: European CommissionThe Commission's Opinion on the Code of Practice states that the Code was prepared in an iterative drafting process that started with the Plenary kick-off event on 30 September 2024, involving nearly 1,000 participants who responded to a call launched by the AI Office on 30 July 2024, with four working groups of independent chairs and vice-chairs.2025-08-01 · signature · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗European Commission: records →
• Issued by: European CommissionThe European Commission issued Opinion C(2025) 5361 final, dated 1 August 2025, on the assessment of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice under Article 56 of the AI Act.2025-08-01 · signature · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗European Commission: records →
• Issued by: European CommissionThe Commission's Opinion on the Code of Practice states that the Code contains no key performance indicators to measure the implementation and outcome of its commitments and that the Commission, in line with the drafters' assessment, considers such indicators currently not appropriate.2025-08-01 · signature · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗European Commission: records →

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.