Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence: An Open Letter
A letter by , Future of Life Institute, dated 28 October 2015. "Published 28 October, 2015" on the current page; the letter was released in January 2015 (not dated on the page).
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Future of Life Institute.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2015-10-28.
- Exact source
- Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence: An Open Letter Future of Life Institute (futureoflife.org) · published 2015-10-28 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 0674f00ad451e6173b07ccbf30bf7acea741201ec951a9d1f74c157727d8c3d4). Current page as served on 2026-10-29; the page states "Published 28 October, 2015", while the letter was released in January 2015.
Appears in
- Arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI →1 record on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Bears on · 1
Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.
- Difficulty of alignmentThe Future of Life Institute's open letter on research priorities of 2015 recommends expanded research to ensure that increasingly capable AI systems are robust and beneficial, stating that AI systems must do what we want them to do.2015-10-28 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Difficulty of alignment: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.