Should We Be Reassured If Automation in the Future Looks Like Automation in the Past?
Should We Be Reassured If Automation in the Future Looks Like Automation in the Past?, by Jason Furman. NBER volume chapter.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Jason Furman.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2019-05.
- Exact source
- Should We Be Reassured If Automation in the Future Looks Like Automation in the Past? NBER volume chapter · published 2019-05 · Full text. Current copy retrieved directly on 2026-10-09; no archive capture (Wayback unreachable), so earlier bytes are not authenticated. SHA-256 a43ecf48d5ec6131dfc002acab3d7df32dffb90bb9b7e41c30c470e14e6e68f6.
Appears in
- Economics of machine intelligence →5 records on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Articulates · 2
Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.
Contests · 1
Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.
Bears on · 2
Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.