Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems

Versions

g7-hiroshima-code-of-conduct: 1 recorded version, oldest first, published by Group of Seven (G7). A version is shown as replacing another only where a record says so. Date order alone never implies it.

1. 2023-10-30 · publishedAs welcomed by the G7 leaders on 30 October 2023 (this version)

This version

Provisions in this version · 4 quoted

A limited selection of quoted provisions: what this edition says about thresholds, required actions, who decides and exceptions. It is not a full summary and says nothing about implementation. A “not found” record states which part of the edition was inspected. It is not a claim that the text was deleted.

• Threshold or triggerProvides voluntary guidance for organisations developing the most advanced AI systems, including the most advanced foundation models and generative AI systems ('advanced AI systems').“will provide voluntary guidance for actions by organizations developing the most advanced AI systems, including the most advanced foundation models and generative AI systems (henceforth "advanced AI systems").”PDF p. 1, first paragraphInspect claim & evidence ↗
• Required actionAction 1: identify, evaluate and mitigate risks across the AI lifecycle, including diverse internal and independent external testing such as red-teaming.“This includes employing diverse internal and independent external testing measures, through a combination of methods for evaluations, such as red-teaming, and implementing appropriate mitigation to address identified risks and vulnerabilities.”PDF p. 2, Action 1Inspect claim & evidence ↗
• Required actionAction 3: publicly report advanced AI systems' capabilities, limitations and domains of appropriate and inappropriate use, including transparency reports for all new significant releases.“This should include publishing transparency reports containing meaningful information for all new significant releases of advanced AI systems.”PDF p. 4, Action 3Inspect claim & evidence ↗
• Who decidesThe G7 commit to develop proposals, with the OECD, GPAI and others, for monitoring tools and mechanisms to help organisations stay accountable for implementing the actions.“We also commit to develop proposals, in consultation with the OECD, GPAI and other stakeholders, to introduce monitoring tools and mechanisms to help organizations stay accountable for the implementation of these actions.”PDF p. 1, introductory textInspect claim & evidence ↗

Earliest version recorded here; no replacement is recorded.

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Not recorded for this document: cites · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.