If Uploads Come First: The Crack of a Future Dawn
Robin Hanson’s article in Extropy no. 13 (third quarter 1994), printed pp. 10–15.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source records list Robin Hanson.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source records give the publication date as 1994 and 1994-03-08.
- Exact source
- Extropy, no. 13 (scan), "If Uploads Come First" Extropy · published 1994 · Photographic scan of the issue; printed pp. 10–15 (PDF pages 8–13) read by the pre-1996 candidate search and a machine check, which confirmed the copyright header and footers. Copy hosted at diyhpl.us.
- If Uploads Come First: The crack of a future dawn Extropy 6:2 (1994) · published 1994-03-08 · Wayback capture of http://hanson.berkeley.edu/uploads.html; compared with the 2000 capture of the hanson.gmu.edu reprint. Capture retrieved 2026-10-08 (SHA-256 c34890e352bba48a521c5237afeeb8d5b2063b3091e46bae35270326b9dbaf61). Versions: Extropy 6:2 (print) (1994): not retrieved; web reprint, hanson.berkeley.edu (1994-03-08 date line): checked (1998-02-20 capture). Published version: Hanson, R. (1994). If uploads come first: The crack of a future dawn. Extropy, 6(2). Printed issue not retrieved; page numbers not checked.Archived copy, captured 1998-02-20: If Uploads Come First: The crack of a future dawn. Captured 1445 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 1998-02-20. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-08.
Appears in
- Propositions about superintelligence, 1863–2022 →3 records on this document
- Economics of machine intelligence →2 records on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Articulates · 2
Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.
Bears on · 3
Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.