Existential risk narratives about AI do not distract from its immediate harms
A journal article by Emma Hoes and Fabrizio Gilardi, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122, dated 17 April 2025. Online publication date given in the PMC record ("2025 Apr 17"); issue date 22 April 2025.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Emma Hoes and Fabrizio Gilardi.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2025-04-17.
- Exact source
- Existential risk narratives about AI do not distract from its immediate harms Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122(16), e2419055122; PubMed Central copy · published 2025-04-17 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 9e9f57b9e1f18efd22d9386c13c02736877e405719bcf54f5f792a796539da3c). PubMed Central HTML of the published brief report (PMC12037001), open access under CC BY 4.0.
Appears in
- Arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI →1 record on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Contests · 1
Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.
- Present harms deserve priorityThe paper by Hoes and Gilardi of April 2025 states that its findings indicate no direct impact of alarmist coverage of AI's existential threats on public concern for the immediate risks of AI, and that concerns about such coverage may be exaggerated.2025-04-17 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Present harms deserve priority: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.