The A.I. Dilemma: Growth versus Existential Risk
The A.I. Dilemma: Growth versus Existential Risk, by Charles I. Jones. NBER Working Paper 31837.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Charles I. Jones.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2023-11.
- Exact source
- The A.I. Dilemma: Growth versus Existential Risk NBER Working Paper 31837 · published 2023-11 · Current copy (NBER PDF), no archive capture compared. Retrieved 2026-10-11. SHA-256 0ac5f541a3c7152b60866b248f66cf2733bf12f01b204161abf375463669035e. Version a reader would cite, or full text, not retrieved. Jones, C. I. (2024). The AI dilemma: Growth versus existential risk. American Economic Review: Insights, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20230570
Appears in
- Economics of machine intelligence →5 records on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Articulates · 2
Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.
Bears on · 3
Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.