How Much Should We Spend to Reduce A.I.'s Existential Risk?
How Much Should We Spend to Reduce A.I.'s Existential Risk?, by Charles I. Jones. NBER Working Paper 33602.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Charles I. Jones.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2025-03.
- Exact source
- How Much Should We Spend to Reduce A.I.'s Existential Risk? NBER Working Paper 33602 · published 2025-03 · Current copy (NBER PDF), no archive capture compared. Retrieved 2026-10-11. SHA-256 56417f65f9c799c22def31f110fef4bd3608c259096f65e3938b95164cfd9dd1.
Appears in
- Economics of machine intelligence →5 records on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Articulates · 3
Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.
Bears on · 2
Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.