Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Document · Research paper

CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinese

Work-level record. Its arXiv versions and any conference or journal version are listed as sources, each with its own date. A citation to the work does not identify which version the citing author read.

Issued by
No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
Authors credited
No authorship claim recorded yet. The source records list arXiv, Haonan Li, Yixuan Zhang, Fajri Koto, Yifei Yang, Hai Zhao, Yeyun Gong, Nan Duan and Timothy Baldwin.
Dates
  • No date claim recorded yet. The source records give the publication date as 2023-06-15.
Exact source
  • CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinese arXiv · published 2023-06-15 · arXiv abstract page, retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 d1697f27a057358b31190278951d876c69521aa989889ebbcfd08b2771d0e2a2). Submission history as arXiv records it (UTC): v1 15 June 2023; v2 17 January 2024. The page serves the latest version; each version is a separate expression, and only the one a record names was read.
  • CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinese arXiv · published 2023-06-15 · arXiv:2306.09212v1, submitted 15 June 2023 (UTC). Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 138c9cf54990bef862512b923a742ba0c874624d3cc4d0c84a07b737d2d1375c). The author list is the byline as printed on the first page.

Appears in

No collection holds a record about this document yet.

Versions

No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Cited by · 5

Recorded documents that explicitly reference this one. A citation to a work does not identify which version was read.

Not recorded for this document: cites · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.

What the document says it adds

The document’s own description of its contribution, quoted from the version each row names. A claim to be the first is the document’s claim; Selekoa does not assess it.