Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Document · Research paper

PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language

Work-level record. Its arXiv versions and any conference or journal version are listed as sources, each with its own date. A citation to the work does not identify which version the citing author read.

Issued by
No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
Authors credited
Yejin Choi
Dates
Exact source
  • PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language arXiv · published 2019-11-26 · arXiv abstract page, retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 5d4ce17006a8adafe0672e29641feb59d6469e58012b339e038bf762af565fce). Submission history as arXiv records it (UTC): v1 26 November 2019. The page serves the latest version; each version is a separate expression, and only the one a record names was read.
  • PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language Crossref · published 2020 · Crossref record of the journal version: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 05, pp. 7432-7439 (DOI 10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6239), retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28. The date is the publisher-deposited date, kept at year precision; it was not checked against the issue.
  • PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language arXiv · published 2019-11-26 · arXiv:1911.11641v1, submitted 26 November 2019 (UTC). Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 64e679066032304ebc8b2787492d77c88d5d70d66184daefec123ae312974a4b). The author list is the byline as printed on the first page.

Appears in

No collection holds a record about this document yet.

Versions

No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.

Issue and authorship records

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Cited by · 5

Recorded documents that explicitly reference this one. A citation to a work does not identify which version was read.

Not recorded for this document: cites · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.

What the document says it adds

The document’s own description of its contribution, quoted from the version each row names. A claim to be the first is the document’s claim; Selekoa does not assess it.