Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Document · Research paper

Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models

Work-level record. Its arXiv versions and any conference or journal version are listed as sources, each with its own date. A citation to the work does not identify which version the citing author read.

Issued by
No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
Authors credited
Denny Zhou · Jason Wei · Quoc Le · Xuezhi Wang
Dates
Exact source
  • Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models International Conference on Learning Representations · published 2023 · ICLR 2023. Located by the cross-family machine check on 2026-10-30 (item A048; PDF title page: “Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2023”; the official conference paper list), at the precision of its source; not read again at admission.
  • Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models arXiv · published 2022-03-21 · arXiv abstract page, retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 ebdbc91093fd99c0b0c74218fdc3df4619d652e964254eec79bf75cf055ba2dc). Submission history as arXiv records it (UTC): v1 21 March 2022; v2 6 April 2022; v3 4 October 2022; v4 7 March 2023. The page serves the latest version; each version is a separate expression, and only the one a record names was read.
  • Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models arXiv · published 2022-03-21 · arXiv:2203.11171v1, submitted 21 March 2022 (UTC). Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 ed1ef6f3ff521a53b9cb873e8fad7991984a5c747ca0ae92d83d4e01e4f39326). The author list is the byline as printed on the first page.

Appears in

No collection holds a record about this document yet.

Versions

No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.

Issue and authorship records

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Cited by · 5

Recorded documents that explicitly reference this one. A citation to a work does not identify which version was read.

Not recorded for this document: cites · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.

What the document says it adds

The document’s own description of its contribution, quoted from the version each row names. A claim to be the first is the document’s claim; Selekoa does not assess it.