Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Document · Research paper

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric

Work-level record. Its arXiv versions and any conference or journal version are listed as sources, each with its own date. A citation to the work does not identify which version the citing author read.

Issued by
No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
Authors credited
No authorship claim recorded yet. The source records list arXiv, Crossref, Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A. Efros, Eli Shechtman and Oliver Wang.
Dates
  • No date claim recorded yet. The source records give the publication date as 2018-01-11 and 2018.
Exact source
  • The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric arXiv · published 2018-01-11 · arXiv abstract page, retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 6e834daa7d124bf57f3f284d789dfb16d8a28f2eac1890394b928a5be641a09a). Submission history as arXiv records it (UTC): v1 11 January 2018; v2 10 April 2018. The page serves the latest version; each version is a separate expression, and only the one a record names was read.
  • The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric Crossref · published 2018 · Crossref record of the conference version: 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 586-595 (DOI 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00068), retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28. The date is the publisher-deposited date, kept at year precision; it was not checked against the issue.
  • The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric arXiv · published 2018-01-11 · arXiv:1801.03924v1, submitted 11 January 2018 (UTC). Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 ebab1bf040c74fd9ba2d632f714bd8eae93a93fce32c80c17e39e9cd0226b5c7). The author list is the byline as printed on the first page.

Appears in

No collection holds a record about this document yet.

Versions

No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.

What the document says it adds

The document’s own description of its contribution, quoted from the version each row names. A claim to be the first is the document’s claim; Selekoa does not assess it.