Why I'm optimistic about our alignment approach
A blog post by Jan Leike, Musings on the Alignment Problem, dated 5 December 2022. date on the post, 5 December 2022.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Jan Leike.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2022-12-05.
- Exact source
- Why I'm optimistic about our alignment approach Musings on the Alignment Problem (aligned.substack.com), the author's newsletter · published 2022-12-05 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 2717984f32c8817f752d65e183dc8bf8ab6bdf286d7fcc7c698e17aca78569e0). Current page as served on 2026-10-29; dated 5 December 2022 on the page.
Appears in
- Arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI →1 record on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Bears on · 1
Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.
- Difficulty of alignmentLeike's post of December 2022 argues that developments of recent years have made AI systems more favourable to alignment than they looked initially, and that a more modest goal, aligning a system able to make more alignment progress than humans, is within reach of OpenAI's approach.2022-12-05 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Difficulty of alignment: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.